IMPACT OF SOWING DIRECTION TOWARDS CARDINAL POINTS ON CROP YIELD
26. 9. 2002 | Odborné konference
Impact of sowing direction towards cardinal points on crop yield
Aleksander SZMIGIEL
Agricultural University of Cracow
Introduction - Úvod
In some former manuals of planting, it was recommended that sowing should be performed in the direction North-South. As justification, it was said that such direction of sowing allows for higher crop yield, especially concerning barley and rye, by 1.0 - 2.0 on ha in comparison to crop yield from sowing in the direction East-West. Considering present level of crop yield this difference would amount to 10% - 15%. Such direction of sowing was also recommended due to its beneficial impact on the protein and starch content in the grain. Kostin [1] explains the higher crop yield of winter rye achieved from sowing in the direction North-South with greater consumption of solar energy. Literature also offers other, although sporadic, reports on the impact of sowing direction on crop yield and chemical composition of plants.
The objective of the studied commenced in 1990 at the Department of Plant Production was to define the impact of the sowing direction towards cardinal points on the crop architecture, assimilation surface of leaves, the grain yield and protein content in grains. In total, six series of careful field experiments were conducted with various species and varieties of spring and winter crops. Some results of these studies have been presented in this article.
Results of the studies
In the years 1991-1994, two field experiments were performed concerning the impact of sowing direction on crop yield of spring triticale. During the experiment conducted on the soil of very good wheat complex near Cracow the impact of sowing direction was studied on crop yield of two varieties of spring triticale: Jago and Maja.
Results of this experiments showed that the direction of sowing had significant impact on the grain crop yield and the protein content in the grain (Table 1). The crop yield of triticale grain in crops seeded in the direction North-South was higher on average by 0.48 t per ha in comparison with the crop yield of seeding in the direction East-West. Protein content in the grain in items seeded in the direction North-South was on average higher by 0.32%.
The experiment conducted in mountain conditions did not show any significant impact of sowing direction on the triticale crop yield (Table 2). A tendency was observed, however, of higher grain yield in items seeded in the direction North-South. These studied proved a significant impact of sowing direction on protein content in the grain. The North-South direction of sowing was more beneficial, and the protein content in the grain was higher by 0.24-1.18% depending on the variety and cultivation technology. In both experiments, plants seeded in the direction North-South featured larger leaf surface and higher LAI index (ratio of leaf surface to soil surface).
Another experiment studying the impact of sowing direction on crop yield of six varieties of spring crops no significant impact on crop yield was observed (Table 3).
Sowing direction North-South had beneficial impact on protein content in the grain, which was higher for this direction on average by 0.08-0.84% depending on the variety as compared with protein content in items seeded in the direction East-West.
In the years 1993-1996, studies were conducted on the impact of sowing direction towards cardinal points on leaf surface and crop yield of various species of winter crops cultivated in two technologies: extensive and intensive (Table 4). The experiment did not show any significant impact on grain yield, yet the crop yield on items seeded in the direction North-South was slightly higher. However, the protein content in the gain of all varieties seeded in the direction North-South was significantly higher.
Conclusions and recommendations
Seeding in the direction North-South is more beneficial as it creates opportunities for achieving higher grain yield.
Protein content in the grain of crops seeded in the direction North-South is higher.
Higher grain yield and the higher protein content in crops seeded in the direction North-South in most cases is related to the greater assimilation surface of leaves and the higher LAI index of leaf number (ratio of leaf surface to soil surface).
If the shape of the field allows to do so, it is recommended that the crops be seeded in the direction North-South or similar.
Literature
Kostin A.W. 1956. “O pogloszczeni swieta listiami poliewych kultur”, Tim Sielekoz, Akad, No 1: 79-86
Nalborczyk E. 1991: “Produkcyjność łanów roślin uprawy polowej.” Fragm Agron. No 2: 5-13
Szmigiel A. 1997a. “Wpływ kierunku siewu na plonowanie pszenżyta jarego”. Zesz. Nauk. AR Szczecin. 175. Roln LXV, 447-450
Szmigiel A. 1997b. “Wpływ kierunku siewu na plonowanie zbóż jarych i zawartość białka w ziarnie” Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln. z. 439: 329-332
Szmigiel A. 1998. “Wpływ kierunku siewu względem stron świata na powierzchnię liści i plonowanie zbóż ozimych” Biul. IIIAR no 205/206: 88-94.
Table 1. Impact of sowing direction on the assimilation surface of leaves, crop yield and protein content in the grain of spring triticale - lowland conditions (average of three years, Szmigiel 1997a)
Sowing direction | Variety | Leaf surface (cm3) | LAI index | Grain yield (t/ha) | Protein % in grain | ||
Blade shooting | earing | Blade shooting | earing | ||||
North-South | Jago Maja | 159 180 | 211 235 | 3.58 3.51 | 4.72 4.22 | 6.47 6.65 | 15.16 15.41 |
East-West | Jago Maja | 147 174 | 214 217 | 3.50 3.45 | 4.37 4.08 | 6.04 6.12 | 14.86 15.07 |
NIR(p=0.05) for sowing direction variety | 0.296 - | 0.276 - | |||||
Table 2. Impact of sowing direction on the assimilation surface of leaves, crop yield and protein content in the grain of spring triticale - mountain conditions (average of three years, Szmigiel 1997a)
Sowing direction | Cultivation technology | Variety | Leaf surface (cm3) | LAI index | Grain yield (t/ha) | Protein % in grain | ||
Blade shooting | earing | Blade shooting | earing | |||||
North-South | standard | Jago Maja | 123 104 | 148 109 | 2.97 3.52 | 3.62 3.80 | 3.45 3.61 | 13.72 14.11 |
Condensed seeding + retardant | Jago Maja | 119 110 | 144 117 | 3.52 3.48 | 3.26 3.64 | 3.36 3.76 | 13.46 13.76 | |
East-West | standard | Jago Maja | 124 92 | 145 109 | 3.01 3.35 | 3.31 3.34 | 3.14 3.45 | 13.48 12.93 |
Condensed seeding + retardant | Jago Maja | 126 115 | 140 107 | 3.34 3.28 | 3.42 3.53 | 3.17 3.64 | 12.93 13.36 | |
NIR(p=0.05) for sowing direction Variety Cultivation technology | - 0.268 - | 0.317 0.276 0.258 | ||||||
Table 3. Impact of sowing direction on crop yield of six varieties of spring crops (t/ha) and protein content in the grain (%). (Szmigiel 1997b)
Species | Variety | North-South | East-West | ||
Grain yield t/ha | Protein content % | Grain yield t/ha | Protein content % | ||
Barley | Ars Lot | 6.21 6.53 | 14.5 13.84 | 5.78 6.69 | 13.66 13.76 |
Wheat | Henika Broma | 7.30 6.86 | 14.10 14.03 | 6.75 6.82 | 13.96 13.67 |
Oat | Koral Farys | 7.02 7.20 | 15.17 14.65 | 6.75 6.90 | 14.74 14.26 |
Average: | 6.85 | 14.38 | 6.61 | 14.01 | |
NIR(p=0.05) for: species sowing direction technology | - 0.280 0.411 | 0.147 0.229 0.295 | - | - | |
Table 4. Impact of sowing direction on leaf surface and crop yield of winter crops (Szmigiel 1998)
Species | Cultiva-tion techno-logy | North-South | East-West | ||||
Grain yield, t/ha | Protein content % | LAI | Grain yield t/ha | Protein content % | LAI | ||
Winter wheat | A B | 5.39 6.55 | 12.06 13.38 | 2.63 3.62 | 5.33 6.28 | 11.54 12.83 | 2.70 3.46 |
Winter barley | A B | 3.74 4.94 | 11.43 13.11 | 2.44 2.97 | 3.76 4.82 | 11.17 12.18 | 2.51 2.80 |
Winter triticale | A B | 5.25 6.28 | 10.02 11.99 | 3.97 4.46 | 5.03 5.40 | 9.65 11.73 | 3.66 4.31 |
NIR(p=0.05) for: species sowing direction technology | 0.336 - 0.283 | 0.394 0.344 0.372 | - | - | - | - | |
A - extensive technology; B - intensive technology
Zdroj: Odborné konference, 26. 9. 2002
© Copyright AGRIS 2003 - Publikování a šíření obsahu agrárního WWW portálu AGRIS je možné (pokud není uvedeno jinak) pouze za podmínky uvedení zdroje v podobě www.agris.cz a data publikace v AGRISu.
Přímá adresa článku:
[http://www.agris.cz/detail.php?id=174169&iSub=518 Vytištěno dne: 21.12.2025 08:03
